Archive for the 'Dating tips' Category

News - Your shares questions tackled

Monday, May 26th, 2008

Justin Urquhart Stewart, the co-founder and director of Seven Investment Management answered your questions on Friday’s programme.

I’ve always wanted to “dabble” in the world of shares but have never known where to start! Where do I go? Is there a dummies guide to shares somewhere?

How do you know when in the year is a good time to start buying? Initially how much should you put down to “test the water?”

Ajay.

Without wishing to endorse any particular guide, there are a number of online resources for this sort of thing, examples of which can be found at:

www.digitallook.com
www.proshareclubs.co.uk
www.moneyweek.com

Stock markets are, by their very nature, in a constant state of flux, so it is impossible to state when is ‘the right time’ to begin dabbling - it will depend on market fluctuations and economic conditions at the time. Most experts will agree that “time in the market” is more important than trying to time the market.

As a general rule, due to the relatively high-risk / high-volatility nature of directly traded shares, they should be treated as medium to long-term investments (a minimum of five years), and should only really make up the proportion of an individual’s portfolio that they can afford to lose.

I have found the best way to learn is with an investment club. These allow you to learn about shares and share trading but without losing your shirt!

Contact Proshare Clubs to find out more and it can be a great way of learning with friends from as little as say 25 per month - well they start off as friends anyway. I belong to one as well.


How do I learn about shares, with a view to investing and hopefully trying to make some money, I don’t have much to invest to start with, say between 2,000 to 5,000.

Any advice would be very helpful as I know very little at present.

Simon Cobrettie.

The stock market, and ways to make money investing, is a vast topic to cover and as such I can recommend the following websites. These should provide good overviews of the markets, how they work and advice for novice investors.

www.citywire.co.uk
www.thisismoney.co.uk

In light of the money you have to invest, you may want to avoid investing in listed companies directly as this could be a very risky and volatile strategy.

Instead I would advocate a much lower risk approach and recommend you invest through instruments that track markets as a whole i.e. the FTSE 100, S&P 500 etc. The cheapest way to access to these tracking instruments is through Exchange Traded Funds (ETF). These trade like ordinary shares but track specific indices and for more information I recommend you take a look at the ishares website.

www.ishares.co.uk

Pooled investments such Unit Trust and OEIC funds are a way of gaining exposure to stock markets with the advantage of lower levels of risk via diversification, with actively-managed funds benefiting further from the continued expertise and monitoring of experienced investment managers. But watch out for the charges (and their deductions).

Eurotunnel has been through a long period of restructuring and we’ve heard from two of their shareholders. I own some Eurotunnel shares and I’ve recently received something in the post about a share swap scheme, unfortunately the accompanying information is extremely difficult to understand and I wanted to know whether it would be better for me to participate in the share swap or keep what I have? I don’t even know what the purpose of the share swap scheme is so it’s hard to make a decision either way.

Antonio Montana.

I have just received a mass of paper from Eurotunnel regarding an offer to exchange my units for new ones. If you have time perhaps a few minutes of your programme could explain what the choices are. The closing date is May 15th.

Julian Fisher.

Groupe Eurotunnel SA is in the process of absorbing Eurotunnel Plc and Eurotunnel SA in a bid to restructure the company’s 6.2bn debt. You are being offered shares/bonds in the new company Groupe Eurotunnel SA and the options available to you are to exchange each unit of Eurotunnel Plc for 1 ordinary Groupe Eurotunnel SA and 1 ordinary equity warrant.

Should you wish to take up this offer you will have the added option of subscribing to a basket of bonds, further details of which should be provided by Eurotunnel Plc shortly. , you may wish to take no action at all. However, you should be aware that the cut off date for responses is 10 May 2007.

Lastly, it is my understanding that under the new agreement shareholders will be eligible for six single journeys a year at a discount of 30% until 2010. After this date all shareholder perks will be at the discretion of the management, full details of which can be found in your pack.

By chance I received an offer from Hargreaves Lansdown this morning to buy shares in their company which is floating in a few months. My question is how do you analyse the market potential of a financial institution, especially one that is essentially an intermediary?

Nick.

Good question - I will be looking at the proportion of recurring income from fees as opposed to sales. The value being that the fees are likely to increase the longer term value of the business.

Hargreaves Lansdown have grown their business very well but I would be tempted to wait until after the flotation to see if the valuation comes back a bit.

However, I suspect with that client base they may become a takeover target for firms wishing to enter the UK market in scale.

Please could you explain, what is meant by “share buy back” when a company announces this, is it a benefit to shareholders?

Bob Hunt.

‘Share Buyback’ is the buying back of outstanding shares (repurchase) by a company in order to reduce the number of shares on the market. Companies will buyback shares either to increase the value of shares still available (reducing supply), or to eliminate any threats by shareholders who may be looking for a controlling stake in that company.

A buyback is a method for a company to invest in itself since they can’t own themselves. Thus, buybacks reduce the number of shares outstanding on the market which increases the proportion of shares the company owns. Buybacks can be carried out in two ways:

1. Shareholders may be presented with a tender offer whereby they have the option to submit (or tender) a portion or all of their shares within a certain time frame and at a premium to the current market price. This premium compensates investors for tendering their shares rather than holding on to them.

2. Companies buy back shares on the open market over an extended period of time.


I have been trying for a year to transfer my shares in an American oil company to my son. However I have so far been unable to do this because it requires Medallion Guarantee Signature. Can you tell me how someone in my position living in Scotland can possibly gain the Medallion Guarantee Signature?

GS Bennett.

The Medallion Guarantee Scheme is a method of trying to provide assurance to a transfer of US stock. It is a bit like and indemnity that would be signed if you lost a share certificate.

A good stockbroker who handles US stocks should be able to help. My old firm of Barclays Stockbrokers in Glasgow should be able to help. There will be a charge but this will vary from firm to firm.


I bought just over 4000 shares in British Airways via the ’staff incentive scheme’ over several years, all at different price levels. The last acquisition of the shares was in 1999.

My question is twofold:

a. If I sell now, would there be an amount of profit where I enter the capital gains tax arena?

b. Could you also advise the best way to sell shares thereby minimising agent fees?

John Cunningham.

John, without knowing the amounts and purchase dates of your British Airways shares I am unable to comment on your capital gains tax liability. What I can tell you is that any gain over 9,200 is subject to Capital Gains Tax for the 07/08 tax year.

To find out what level of tax you would need to pay, if any at all, I recommend you look at the Inland Revenue’s website:

www.hmrc.gov.uk

If you are still unsure about your tax liability I suggest you seek advice from a qualified accountant.

In answer to your second question there are a number of online share dealing firms that offer varying commission rates. I have provided internet addresses for a number of these and I’ll let you make your own comparison.

Alternatively, if you hold the shares in certificated form, the easiest way to sell them would be directly through the registrar - Computershare Investor Services 0870 702 0002.

www.etrade.co.uk
www.etrade.co.uk
www.tdwaterhouse.co.uk
www.stockbrokers.barclays.co.uk
www.iii.co.uk

I am being approached by ‘phone by a company in the name of “Regency” whom I understand are in Bahrain. They are offering me shares in a company which apparantely is due to float into the stock market arround September/October 2007. The company’s name is US Petroleum Holdings.

My questions are:

a. Is there a way I can check out these Companies, Regency and US Petroleum Holdings.

b. Is there a way I can check out whether or not US Petroleum Holdings are due to float into the stock market.

c. Is this usual for companies to approach individuals and try to sell them shares in companies before they float? I am only a very, very small investor in the stock market and therefore would not make any difference to these companies with my investment. However, if what they claim is true they could make a little difference to me.”

Manuela Vazquez .

The internet is a good way to find basic details of a company. If the company is UK based you can check its validity with Companies House. Their website is:

www.companieshouse.gov.uk

You should always seek professional guidance from an adviser or stockbroker as not all companies advertised are as honest as they appear. They will be able to reassure you of the validity of the company and whether they are about to float.

You should beware of ‘Boiler rooms’, who are high pressure sales firms, often based overseas, who target investors - often sophisticated investors - to illegally offer them non-tradeable, overpriced or even non-existent shares. They acquire shareholder lists legitimately using data supplied under the Companies Act or from other sources.

The best advise I can give is that if you are unsure always check with a trusted professional advisor.

I understand that brokers have their private clients, and the clients pay for a service, which includes advice on shares.

What puzzles me is the status of broker’s tips that are found in the media and on certain internet financial pages.

Are these tips leaked information by clients, or freebies released by brokers to advertise their service.
I’m not really sure how brokers actually buy and sell shares, match deals and how prices are fixed.

Dave Lawton .

An Analyst within a stock broking firm will produce research notes and initially present them to existing clients. Thereafter, the stock broking firm may chose to release these notes to the media with the intention that if a particular recommendation does well, it may raise the profile of the firm.

However beware as often research can be produced by brokers who represent the company and therefore have a certain bias. Also beware it’s age as they go out of date very quickly and also if it is for the retail market or for the market (if you have a spare 500,000 around!)

In basic terms, the role of the stockbroker is to act on behalf of investors in the purchasing and selling of securities. To do so, they approach “Market Makers” who make markets by quoting both the buy and sell price of individual stocks and shares.

Alliance Boots has just been taken over by a private equity group. Many of our viewers are shareholders in the company - what happens to them?

The shareholders are going to be offered 11.39 per share and that includes the last dividend.
Not all the details have been finalised yet, so you have to wait for Alliance Boots to write to you.

The opinions expressed are Justin’s, not the programme’s. The answers are not intended to be definitive and should be used for guidance only. Always seek professional advice for your own particular situation.

Read more about .

News - Help with Tax

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

John Whiting, tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, answers your questions about tax.


Mr. King from Fife has a question on inheritance tax; he wants to know if funeral expenses, solicitor’s fees, executors’ expenses, unpaid debts and charities are exempt from the tax? He is 84 years old and manages his finances himself; in the event of his death he will only require a solicitor to handle the winding up of his affairs in accordance with his will.

When somebody dies, inheritance tax is calculated by reference to the value of the estate on death - essentially open market value of the estate. From this, it is possible to deduct a limited range of liabilities such as:

  • Reasonable funeral expenses (what is reasonable can depend on who you are).

  • Your general unpaid debts.

  • Expenses in or realising property situated outside the UK (up to 5%).

    Unfortunately solicitor’s fees and executors’ expenses are not deductible when it comes to inheritance tax. However, if you leave money to a charity, such gifts are left out of your estate when it comes to working out the tax - so if your estate were 300,000 and you left 50,000 to a charity, that would mean for IHT purposes you had left an estate of 250,000 to all intents and purposes.

    David Storey from Wakefield has a question about share dividends:

    When payment is received either as a cheque or payment in respect of free shares. What is the correct date to declare on my tax return, the company year-end date or the date the payment is received?

    You use payment date rather than the company year-end date for tax return purposes. Dividend payments, for example, always show the effective date of the payment and you need to be guided by this. The company’s year for which the payment is made is irrelevant for deciding which tax year the dividend falls into.

    Jonathan Edmunds from Devon has a question about his tax coding. In January he was given a tax coding for next year that included not only the money he owed from self-assessment but an addition of 2900 for next year based on assumed extra earnings.

    He complained about this and they have removed it. Is it common practice for the Revenue to overestimate earnings in this way, and can you always get it changed?

    This highlights an issue that has received a deal of publicity recently and which a lot of taxpayers need to be aware of. tax codes have been used simply to tax wages, salaries and pensions. They are also used to tax benefits and to recover small of tax in one year, all done by reducing your code and thus the amount of tax-free pay that you get.

    Partly in an effort to stop some taxpayers having to fill in self assessment tax returns, the Revenue have started to use the tax code to collect small amounts of tax due on investment income from higher rate taxpayers who have a little bit more tax to pay. Thus they’d be paying the tax during the year through their tax code rather than after the year via completing their tax return. This is fine in principle but if as is probable your income from investments fluctuates, the taxpayer will still be faced with checking the amounts and potentially making a further small payment or reclaim after the year end.

    For small amounts, then, this is a sensible enough procedure. However the Revenue have taken powers to formalise this procedure - it happened in practice to recover sundry small fees as well - but have in some cases started to suggest they can use the tax code to collect quite significant amounts of tax on freelance earnings and rentals. The problem is, as you no doubt highlighted to them, the amounts are uncertain and you have no way of knowing whether you will receive them. Many people will in any case have to make payments on account of these tax liabilities. The taxpayer has a right to object to this coding and in my view should certainly do so if the amounts of extra income are at all uncertain. Otherwise they could find themselves at best temporarily out of pocket because they have paid the tax earlier than necessary.

    Jacob Caudwell doesn’t have a company car but uses his own for work for which he gets compensated 35p per mile. He pays more for business insurance and also loses more each year in depreciation as he does around 75000 miles a year. How is he effected by taxation?

    If you use your own car for work - not just for commuting to work but for actual business mileage - the Revenue has a standard rate of mileage allowance. This is 40p for the first 10,000 miles a year and 25p for miles thereafter.

    What this means is that if your employer reimburses you at these rates, the amounts are tax-free. If they pay you more than this, the excess is taxable; if they pay you less then you can claim the balance as an expense through your tax return. If you are doing 75,000 business miles and have received 35p a miles for this, I am afraid that you are facing a potential tax bill on 6,000.

    This may seem unjust to you as it may well be that the mileage allowances don’t compensate for the total costs of running your car. Unfortunately there is no alternative other than perhaps to go to your employer and suggest it really is about time they provided you with a company car.

    Graeme Coker from Merseyside says that he and his wife put a deposit on a new build property last June and have been living with their parents until completion. They’re now thinking of selling the house, which has gone up in value by around 20,000. Would they have to pay capital gains?

    This is an interesting question. As no doubt you are well aware, individuals or married couples don’t pay tax on their “principal private residence” - i.e. the house they live in. But strictly you have to have occupied the house so that it is clearly demonstrated to be your residence. If you haven’t lived there, even for a modest period, the Revenue could argue that there is no capital gains tax exemption due. If that were the case, you’d have to pay CGT on the gain you have made though costs (such as estate agents and lawyers fees) would be deductible and once the gain has been split between you and your wife you may well find that the capital gains tax annual exemption would cover the residual gain leaving you with no tax bill.

    However, there is another lurking danger. The Revenue may assert that in fact you are due to pay income tax on this gain that you made - that you went into this transaction with the intention of making a profit. That’s something you may be able to demonstrate simply wasn’t the case but you need to be aware of the risk and plan accordingly. Perhaps it would be worth going to live there for a spell!

    Jan Whitehead from Kent is considering selling an investment property. By so doing, she would be liable for Capital Gains Tax? If instead, she takes out a mortgage on the property and transfers the funds raised into buying a new investment property would this be a better option?

    If you take out a mortgage to buy a property that you are renting out, then the interest that you pay on the mortgage loan is deductible from your rental income. This is an important feature of the calculation of the attractiveness or otherwise of the buy-to-let market. Currently there is no limit on the amount of mortgage interest that you can get tax relief for in this way - it’s not like the old 30,000 limit that there was for MIRAS relief.

    Whether or not you have a mortgage doesn’t affect the capital gains tax calculation. That is simply in terms of the difference between what you get for the property less what you paid for it, adjusted for all the various costs you’ve incurred of a capital nature - but the mortgage is a separate matter.

    John Clark from Newcastle upon Tyne is asking for some top tips on mitigating the effect of inheritance tax on an estate of about 500,000?

    Clearly if you’ve got an estate of about 500,000, you’re into the inheritance tax net and if it all went to your children, for example, your estate would be facing an IHT bill of around 100,000.

    In terms of three top tips, I would say:

    1. Make a will - although this doesn’t necessarily save IHT, at least it means your assets go where you want them to.

    2. Any married couple should do this as a joint exercise to work out where the assets will go and try and make sure that best use is made of both partners’ nil rate IHT band.

    3. Consider starting to give away assets now - make use of the annual exemption, the exemption for normal gifts out of income and consider whether you can make larger gifts which, provided you survive 7 years, will be outside the inheritance tax net.

    We could then talk about whether investing in agricultural or business property was appropriate as these get good reliefs, whether you should give away to children or , whether Trusts have a part to play in gifting and various other ideas but I hope this will do for starters!

    Malcolm Conway asks, is the value of large monetary gifts given in the final seven years of somebody’s life added to the value of their estate before inheritance tax is calculated? He and his wife own their house as ‘tenants in common’, can you explain how this affects the estate following the death of the first partner?

    When working out the value of somebody’s estate, gifts made within the 7 years before death are indeed added to the estate and count as the first “slice” of value when it comes to utilising the inheritance tax nil-rate band. If you and your wife made a joint gift to children of (say) 100,000, that would be treated as if you had each made a gift of 50,000 in normal circumstances.

    Your owning the house as tenants in common means that you and your wife each own your own share of the house. That means that on death you can leave your half to whomever you wish. This is in contrast to “joint tenants” which is the way most people own their houses. In such cases, when one party dies, the other joint tenant automatically gets the whole property.

  • How do yo think, is it true about ?

    Sport - Venues for Cup semi-finals named

    Friday, May 23rd, 2008


    Hull Kingston Rovers and St Helens will play their Challenge Cup semi-final at Galpharm Stadium on Saturday, 29 July (1230 BST).


    Rovers, who beat Warrington to become only the second National League club to reach the semis, lifted the Cup for the only time in their history in 1980.


    In the other last-four clash, Leeds, beaten finalists in two of the last three years, take on Huddersfield.


    That game takes place at Bradford’s Odsal Stadium on 30 July (1500 BST).

    What better way than to test yourself against the team that is at the top of the Super League

    Hull KR coach Justin Morgan


    The Leeds tie will pit Giants coach Jon Sharp against his old Huddersfield boss Tony Smith.


    Hull KR coach Justin Morgan will also be up against a familiar foe, his former Parramatta and New Zealand Warriors boss Daniel Anderson.


    Family ties will also be tested as Anderson’s brother Hunter is married to fellow Morgan’s sister Nicole.


    “I see it as a nice reward,” said Morgan, who also took Toulouse to the semi-finals last year.


    “I’m quite pleased with the draw.


    “It will be a great occasion for the club and the players. What better way than to test yourself against the team that is at the top of the Super League.


    “They’ve got some great players and they play a great brand of rugby league. They’re sprinkled with superstars.”


    Anderson has guided Saints to 14 wins from their 15 matches so far in Super League XI, while Rovers’ 40-36 Warrington victory was a Hull KR club-record 18th straight win.

    I think Huddersfield are a real dangerous package

    Leeds assistant coach Brian McDermott


    Anderson said: “It was a little bit nerve-wracking watching the draw. It’s not that I didn’t want to play Leeds but we play them the week before the semis.


    “It would have been an ugly little couple of weeks with smoke and mirrors.”


    In the Yorkshire derby, the Rhinos will be firm favourites but assistant coach Brian McDermott is warning his team to beware of his former Bradford team-mate Robbie Paul.


    The 30-year-old Kiwi is a veteran of five Cup finals and was the Giants’ man of the match in their 44-14 win over Salford.


    “I think Huddersfield are a real dangerous package,” said McDermott.


    “Everyone knows what St Helens are about and Hull KR have shocked the game of rugby league with their win over Warrington.

    No-one will expect us to win…which means all the pressure will be on Leeds

    Giants coach Jon Sharp


    “But no one appears to be talking about the Giants. You just have to look at how they tore Salford apart to see how good they are. They will be a real threat.


    “Huddersfield have hit some form recently and Brad Drew in particular has been and then they’ve got a little fellow who I know plenty about in Robbie Paul.


    “Robbie is unpredictable. He doesn’t play too much to game plans but he can rip any team apart. He will be a very dangerous player against us.


    “He has experience of playing in semi-finals and I am sure he will be able to give them some tips on .”


    Huddersfield’s Sharp said: “We’re happy with the draw. It’s a game where we know we’ve nothing to lose and everything to gain.


    “No-one will expect us to win, apart from those inside this club, which means all the pressure will be on Leeds.


    “It’s a tie where we can go out there and enjoy the occasion.”


    The final will take place at Twickenham on 26 August.

    How do yo think, is it true about ?

    News - Help with Tax

    Thursday, May 22nd, 2008


    John Whiting, tax partner at , answers your questions about tax.


    Mr. King from Fife has a question on inheritance tax; he wants to know if funeral expenses, solicitor’s fees, executors’ expenses, unpaid debts and charities are exempt from the tax? He is 84 years old and manages his finances himself; in the event of his death he will only require a solicitor to handle the winding up of his affairs in accordance with his will.

    When somebody dies, inheritance tax is calculated by reference to the value of the estate on death - essentially open market value of the estate. From this, it is possible to deduct a limited range of liabilities such as:

  • Reasonable funeral expenses (what is reasonable can depend on who you are).

  • Your general unpaid debts.

  • Expenses in administering or realising property situated outside the UK (up to 5%).

    Unfortunately solicitor’s fees and executors’ expenses are not deductible when it comes to inheritance tax. However, if you leave money to a charity, such gifts are left out of your estate when it comes to working out the tax - so if your estate were 300,000 and you left 50,000 to a charity, that would mean for IHT purposes you had left an estate of 250,000 to all intents and purposes.

    David Storey from Wakefield has a question about share dividends:

    When payment is received either as a cheque or payment in respect of free shares. What is the correct date to declare on my tax return, the company year-end date or the date the payment is received?

    You use payment date rather than the company year-end date for tax return purposes. Dividend payments, for example, always show the effective date of the payment and you need to be guided by this. The company’s year for which the payment is made is irrelevant for deciding which tax year the dividend falls into.

    Jonathan Edmunds from Devon has a question about his tax coding. In January he was given a tax coding for next year that included not only the money he owed from self-assessment but an addition of 2900 for next year based on assumed extra earnings.

    He complained about this and they have removed it. Is it common practice for the Revenue to overestimate earnings in this way, and can you always get it changed?

    This highlights an issue that has received a deal of publicity recently and which a lot of taxpayers need to be aware of. Traditionally tax codes have been used simply to tax wages, salaries and pensions. They are also used to tax benefits and to recover small underpayments of tax in one year, all done by reducing your code and thus the amount of tax-free pay that you get.

    Partly in an effort to stop some taxpayers having to fill in self assessment tax returns, the Revenue have started to use the tax code to collect small amounts of tax due on investment income from higher rate taxpayers who have a little bit more tax to pay. Thus they’d be paying the tax during the year through their tax code rather than after the year via completing their tax return. This is fine in principle but if as is probable your income from investments fluctuates, the taxpayer will still be faced with checking the amounts and potentially making a further small payment or reclaim after the year end.

    For small amounts, then, this is a sensible enough procedure. However the Revenue have taken powers to formalise this procedure - it happened in practice to recover sundry small fees as well - but have in some cases started to suggest they can use the tax code to collect quite significant amounts of tax on freelance earnings and rentals. The problem is, as you no doubt highlighted to them, the amounts are uncertain and you have no way of knowing whether you will receive them. Many people will in any case have to make payments on account of these tax liabilities. The taxpayer has a right to object to this coding and in my view should certainly do so if the amounts of extra income are at all uncertain. Otherwise they could find themselves at best temporarily out of pocket because they have paid the tax earlier than necessary.

    Jacob Caudwell doesn’t have a company car but uses his own for work for which he gets compensated 35p per mile. He pays more for business insurance and also loses more each year in depreciation as he does around 75000 miles a year. How is he effected by taxation?

    If you use your own car for work - not just for commuting to work but for actual business mileage - the Revenue has a standard rate of mileage allowance. This is 40p for the first 10,000 miles a year and 25p for miles thereafter.

    What this means is that if your employer reimburses you at these rates, the amounts are tax-free. If they pay you more than this, the excess is taxable; if they pay you less then you can claim the balance as an expense through your tax return. If you are doing 75,000 business miles and have received 35p a miles for this, I am afraid that you are facing a potential tax bill on 6,000.

    This may seem unjust to you as it may well be that the mileage allowances don’t compensate for the total costs of running your car. Unfortunately there is no alternative other than perhaps to go to your employer and suggest it really is about time they provided you with a company car.

    Graeme Coker from Merseyside says that he and his wife put a deposit on a new build property last June and have been living with their parents until completion. They’re now thinking of selling the house, which has gone up in value by around 20,000. Would they have to pay capital gains?

    This is an interesting question. As no doubt you are well aware, individuals or married couples don’t pay tax on their “principal private residence” - i.e. the house they live in. But strictly you have to have occupied the house so that it is clearly demonstrated to be your residence. If you haven’t lived there, even for a modest period, the Revenue could argue that there is no capital gains tax exemption due. If that were the case, you’d have to pay CGT on the gain you have made though costs (such as estate agents and lawyers fees) would be deductible and once the gain has been split between you and your wife you may well find that the capital gains tax annual exemption would cover the residual gain leaving you with no tax bill.

    However, there is another lurking danger. The Revenue may assert that in fact you are due to pay income tax on this gain that you made - that you went into this transaction with the intention of making a profit. That’s something you may be able to demonstrate simply wasn’t the case but you need to be aware of the risk and plan accordingly. Perhaps it would be worth going to live there for a spell!

    Jan Whitehead from Kent is considering selling an investment property. By so doing, she would be liable for Capital Gains Tax? If instead, she takes out a mortgage on the property and transfers the funds raised into buying a new investment property would this be a better option?

    If you take out a mortgage to buy a property that you are renting out, then the interest that you pay on the mortgage loan is deductible from your rental income. This is an important feature of the of the attractiveness or otherwise of the buy-to-let market. Currently there is no limit on the amount of mortgage interest that you can get tax relief for in this way - it’s not like the old 30,000 limit that there was for MIRAS relief.

    Whether or not you have a mortgage doesn’t affect the capital gains tax calculation. That is simply in terms of the difference between what you get for the property less what you paid for it, adjusted for all the various costs you’ve incurred of a capital nature - but the mortgage is a separate matter.

    John Clark from Newcastle upon Tyne is asking for some top tips on mitigating the effect of inheritance tax on an estate of about 500,000?

    Clearly if you’ve got an estate of about 500,000, you’re into the inheritance tax net and if it all went to your children, for example, your estate would be facing an IHT bill of around 100,000.

    In terms of three top tips, I would say:

    1. Make a will - although this doesn’t necessarily save IHT, at least it means your assets go where you want them to.

    2. Any married couple should do this as a joint exercise to work out where the assets will go and try and make sure that best use is made of both partners’ nil rate IHT band.

    3. Consider starting to give away assets now - make use of the annual exemption, the exemption for normal gifts out of income and consider whether you can make larger gifts which, provided you survive 7 years, will be outside the inheritance tax net.

    We could then talk about whether investing in or business property was appropriate as these get good reliefs, whether you should give away to children or , whether Trusts have a part to play in gifting and various other ideas but I hope this will do for starters!

    Malcolm Conway asks, is the value of large monetary gifts given in the final seven years of somebody’s life added to the value of their estate before inheritance tax is calculated? He and his wife own their house as ‘tenants in common’, can you explain how this affects the estate following the death of the first partner?

    When working out the value of somebody’s estate, gifts made within the 7 years before death are indeed added to the estate and count as the first “slice” of value when it comes to utilising the inheritance tax nil-rate band. If you and your wife made a joint gift to children of (say) 100,000, that would be treated as if you had each made a gift of 50,000 in normal circumstances.

    Your owning the house as tenants in common means that you and your wife each own your own share of the house. That means that on death you can leave your half to whomever you wish. This is in contrast to “joint tenants” which is the way most people own their houses. In such cases, when one party dies, the other joint tenant gets the whole property.

  • News - Milly charity in postcard contest

    Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

    Young artists have the chance to design postcards carrying safety for a charity set up in memory of murder victim Milly Dowler.

    Winning images will appear on postcards distributed to schools and colleges around Surrey, where Milly lived.

    The is being organised by Milly’s Fund, the charity set up by the schoolgirl’s parents.

    The 13-year-old from Walton-on-Thames was killed in 2002 but nobody has been charged with her murder.

    Keeping memory alive

    Bob and Sally Dowler set up the fund with the twin aims of keeping the memory of their daughter alive and attempting to stop other children suffering the same fate.

    The postcard competition is being run in partnership with Surrey Police and is open to students aged 11-21 who attend schools, colleges or in Surrey.

    It is split into two age groups with school children in years seven to 11 asked to create designs linked to mobile phones, bullying and “keeping your stuff safe”.

    The themes for the older age group are “out and about” and socialising.

    Six 50 prizes are to be awarded to winning artists.

    The closing date for the competition is 30 April and more details are available on the Milly’s Fund website.

    Sport - A strong mind

    Monday, May 19th, 2008

    It is easy to get nervous when you step onto the tee.

    What I do is take a couple of deep breaths to get rid of all the negative energy and breathe in the positive stuff.

    When your muscles lack oxygen they tense up. What you want are nice, relaxed muscles to get the most efficient swing.

    4. Stick to your routine

    More than anything you need to have your routine. Next time you watch Tiger or Ernie look at their routine. That’s their way of comfortable.

    I walk up to a shot and look where I want it to go. Next I take a practice swing. Then I cock my club back, once looking at the target, then two more times.

    It’s then that I’m relaxed and ready to hit the shot.

    5. Don’t even think about it

    Last of all when you play your shot don’t think about it. Just hit it.

    If you’ve done your and your you should be fine. Standing over the ball is not the place to think about your grip or your swing.

    Do your on the driving range.

    News - Kate’s downloading advice

    Sunday, May 18th, 2008

    Whilst many s offered for download online are completely legitimate, some free downloads might contain spyware, or even malicious code designed to hijack your browser, or infect your PC with a virus.

    But that is not to say you should panic and never download from the web.

    The inclusion of spyware is quite common, as it allows the software providers to make an income by selling the data it collects from its users.

    Should you wish to remove spyware, using an up-to-date spyware scanner usually proves effective - though occasionally the application you’ve originally downloaded may not run if it detects the embedded spyware has been removed.

    You would have to be very unlucky to hit a download that contains malicious code, and taking a few basic precautions should help protect you.

    What do others say?

    Before a download, always check the validity of the software.

    Are then any reviews on reputable websites? Find out what other people are saying about it.

    Open up one of the popular search engines, type the download file name, the program name, and the word “spyware” into the search box.

    If others have had problems you’ll find plenty of results shouting about it.

    Always scan a download for viruses before you double click to execute it - as once you do, there’s no turning back.

    And finally, it is also a good idea to back up your data regularly, so if it does all go wrong you can at least restore your system.


    Registering online

    Many websites require you to register to reach certain sections.

    Giving personal details online is always a risk and you can find yourself awash with a flood of unwanted spam if you’re not careful.

    The golden rule here is read the privacy policy - especially if you are being asked to give more than just an email address and screen name.

    Every website collecting personal details from its users is required to include a privacy policy section, and the link is usually to be found somewhere at the bottom of the registration page.

    It is also worth noting that many websites will have an ‘opt out’ tick box for receiving data from third party .

    Make sure you read all of the registration fields and make that adjustment before hitting the OK button.

    As opening an email account is free, it may be worth considering using an account purely for the purposes of with websites.

    That way you won’t inundate your regular email address with unwanted emails - and in the process have a one-stop-shop for any information pertaining to the websites which you’ve registered with.


    Click Online is broadcast on BBC News 24: Saturday at 2030, Sunday at 0430 and 1630, and on Monday at 0030. A short version is also shown on BBC Two: Saturday at 0645 and BBC One: Sunday at 0730. Also BBC World.

    News - Avoiding a pension black hole

    Saturday, May 17th, 2008

    A financial expert gives some tips to people who are worried about retirement.

    So here you are in your fifties staring at a pension black hole.

    Perhaps your investments have fallen in line with the stock market or maybe you have not invested at all.

    You could even be in the position of having had your company pension scheme close.

    Whatever the reason the simple truth is that you are going to get less than you would probably like to live on in retirement.

    How to escape from this impending financial disaster?

    First of all you need to assess where you are, as far as paying for your retirement is concerned.

    If you have a private or company pension find out how much it is going to be worth to you.

    But be aware that current pension projections are being scaled down as insurers try to prevent investors moving their money out.

    In time, as long as the stock market recovers, pension fund projections will return to truly reflecting the underlying value of the funds assets.

    Once you have identified your shortfall it is a relatively easy job to calculate the extra savings you need to make.

    Mind the gap

    ISAs, individual savings accounts, are a tax efficient way of saving as investment gain remains out of the clutches of the taxman.

    For higher tax rate payers paying into a pension, even relatively close to retirement age, is still attractive due to their tax efficiency.

    All in all, if you have five or more years before retirement and you don’t mind the risk then go for a stock market investment.

    As a rule of thumb, over the longer term, shares and stock market based funds have outperformed other types of investment.

    Generally, stock market funds such as unit trusts and investment trusts are a safer bet as they invest in a basket of shares rather than ploughing money into the shares of a single company.

    Delaying tactics

    In the final analysis you may decide to delay your retirement - this is an option which is being increasingly encouraged by the government.

    Put simply, by retiring later the pot of money you have to live off in your retirement will go further.

    As more Briton’s live longer many will have to face up to the fact that the days of moving straight from the world of work into retirement are over.

    From 2006 courtesy of the EU will ban employers from enforcing fixed retirement dates so you should have no problem working on if you wish beyond age 65.

    Oh. and if you do work after 65 you’ll receive a little bonus from the Government courtesy of the increased personal allowance.

    This is worth a 438 saving in income tax per year for a basic rate tax payer.

    Home front

    An Englishman’s home is his castle, it is also fast becoming one of the main ways of paying for retirement.

    As house prices have soared, equity release schemes - where you receive the loan as cash, usually on a monthly basis, but sometimes as a lump sum, and continue to live in your home - are becoming increasingly popular.

    There is nothing wrong with releasing equity from your property if it means avoiding pensioner poverty.

    But beware there is growing concern about some of the charges and clauses with such contracts. It maybe a sound idea to seek independent financial advice.

    The opinions expressed are Mr Crooks, not the BBC’s. The advice is not intended to be definitive and should be used for guidance only. Always seek professional advice for your own particular situation.

    News - Twins ‘joined at head’ separated

    Friday, May 16th, 2008

    conjoined twins who were born with the tips of their heads fused together have been successfully separated, doctors say.

    Doctors said Carl and Clarence Aguirre, from the Philippines, were “strong and stable”.

    The marathon operation took place at Children’s Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center, New York, on Wednesday.

    It was the latest in a series of procedures carried out on the boys over the last 10 months.

    Normally, doctors attempt to separate conjoined twins during one long procedure.

    The US team chose to carry out several shorter procedures instead in an attempt to shorten the time the twins spent under anaesthetic, reducing the risk of bleeding and injury to the brain.

    In previous operations, the boys’ skull was opened, their
    separate-but-touching brains carefully pushed apart and
    most of their shared blood vessels cut and divided.

    Between surgery, the boys were given time to heal and to adapt to their rerouted circulation systems.

    , veins near Clarence’s brain were doing much of the circulation work for both twins but scans showed dormant veins on Carl’s side had “plumped up” and begun working in response to the surgery.

    Reconstruction

    During this latest operation, doctors completed an incision around their shared skull before teasing apart abutting portions of the boys’ brains

    Surgeons operate on Carl and Clarence Aguirre


    You’re now the mother of two boys


    Words of surgeon Dr David to the twins’ mother after the operation

    The twins’ head-to-head operating tables were then slightly pulled apart so that the remaining tissue could be separated.

    Doctors had to cut and divide the major vein the boys still shared, and separate the remaining area - about an
    inch and a half across - where the brains were touching -

    The twins also shared a dura mater, the membrane that covers the brain, so doctors had to reconstruct membranes for both boys.

    The boys skulls will be reconstructed in another operation at a later date.

    A hospital explained how Dr David Staffenberg, the boys’ plastic surgeon, who led the surgery, broke the news to the twins’ mother, Arlene Aguirre, after the operation.

    She said: “He got on his knees, took Aguirre’s hands and said ‘You’re now the mother of two boys’.”

    Mrs Aguirre then burst into tears, she said.

    News - Doctor Who, fashion icon

    Thursday, May 15th, 2008

    He’s been a dandy, an Edwardian cricketer and most famously wore a long scarf. Doctor Who’s togs change as he regenerates. So what are the fashion tips from everyone’s favourite Time Lord?

    Flamboyant. Garish. Bizarre. Seldom does Time Lord fashion make it to the High Street.

    Until now. When David Tennant takes over the role later this year, it will be in what he describes as “geek chic”.

    Gone is his predecessor’s tailored leather jacket. Instead Tennant will look like the type of man Kate Moss might date, with a just-got-out-of-bed, dragged-through-a-hedge-backwards, only-thing-I-could-find look.

    So what are the key points of the look, which was devised for the programme’s makers by a freelance costume designer?

    Brown pin-striped suit: Gone are the days of Angus Deayton-inspired stigma for men wearing brown suits. And this is surely a sign that pin-stripes have been well and truly reclaimed from City bankers.

    White shirt, unbuttoned at the collar with loose tie: Christopher Eccleston as the Doctor wouldn’t have gone near a tie, preferring Michael V-necked jumpers. A signal perhaps that the Tennant Doctor will be a slightly more erudite character than Eccleston’s action-and-sarcasm hero?

    Skinny trousers and trainers: Converse trainers are white hot items this summer, selling out within hours of hitting the shelves in some shops. The trousers are skinny and crumpled - think Pete Doherty - and if they were much tighter, Norman Wisdom would be demanding royalties.

    Long brown trench coat: A cross between an old hack’s Mac and flasher attire, with a twist of debonair gent. A lo-fi contrast to the high gloss trenchcoats Keanu Reeves swirled through The Matrix in?

    The look is Franz Ferdinand cum Kaiser Chiefs. But is it Time Lord? Does it have the gravitas, the power and the magic that goes with such an eminent position? Will it make the Slitheen, the Autons and the Gelth quake in their boots, or will it simply reduce the Daleks to helpless laughter?

    Jarvis Cocker, Alex Kapranos from Franz Ferdinand, and Pete Doherty

    The Doctor’s fashion icons?

    Only time will tell, but the new look should further cement the popularity of the series, says Mark Hooper, associate editor at men’s magazine Esquire.

    The programme makers seem to be trying to move with the times, to catch a hipper demographic’s eye, he says.

    “The outfit looks really good. Someone said to me it looks a bit Jarvis Cocker, kind of geeky but cool. It is a much younger look, like he’s in an indie band. The pinstripe suit is quite , quite timely. It’s a bit of an professor look, but trendy with it. It’s slightly eccentric.”

    WHO IS DR WHO?
    The different Dr Who characters

    So how do Tennant’s Soho-louche kecks compare with those of his predecessors?

    The original Doctor, the rather grandfatherly figure of William Hartnell, was fond of a black frock coat. His twinkly successor Patrick Troughton wore baggy trousers, while Jon Pertwee was a bit of a dandy with his capes and frills.

    But for Hooper, there is still only one Doctor Who outfit.

    “I still think the Tom Baker scarf is a classic - that’s what I grew up with. Peter Davison’s cricket outfit didn’t do it for me. And I just remember Jon Pertwee having big cuffs.”

    But there are risks from flirting with high fashion, as the new Doctor might find out when he comes on to TV screens after Christmas. Fashion - just like time itself - moves quickly, as any time lord should know.


    Add your comments on this story, using the form below.

    He looks like a child dressed by another child. Great for a companion, but awful for Doctor Who himself.
    Paul Williams, Cheltenham, England

    Even if you dressed Dr Who in a bikini and feather boa it wouldn’t matter - he’s much more about mannerisms and movement - as per the chaotic physicality of Sylvester McCoy’s Who or the taut darkness of Chris Ecclestone.
    Shane Wexford, Uttoxeter, UK

    Where are the accessories? I remember a piece of celery on the cricket jumper and the question mark umbrella handle.
    Would be nice to have a badge on the jacket with a something like “Who were you expecting?” Okay - maybe not that, but you know something smart, playing on words - an in-joke kind of thing.
    Liane, Fleet

    Looks like someone popping down to the video shop after a long day as an admin clerk…

    Darren, Chelmsford UK

    David Tennant’s Dr Who Indie-geek-chic costume maintains a look of eccentricity yet avoids looking camp.
    James Thresher, Putney, London

    A great costume. It has all of the flamboyance of early Doctors but is very contemporary and cuts quite a dash. It’s nicely eccentric without being off-the-wall.
    Dalek Links Webmaster, Stockport UK

    ***Swoon***
    Nia Williams, Liverpool

    It’s Sherlock Holmes in trainers!
    Michael, UK

    Terms & Conditions